“We need to get the infrastructure built up and find some funding for scholarships,” Sachs said. He also plans to tap a vast network of contacts on the Eastern Shore. Sachs, who was once an assistant at Archbishop Spalding under Mike Glick, intends to actively recruit Anne Arundel County and is confident he’ll bring in a few prospects from this area in time for next season. Sachs has already spoken at length with longtime friend Bill Lewit, who captured a NJCAA Division I national championship at Cecil Community College and is now an assistant at Northwestern State in Louisiana. Of course, Sachs was quite comfortable working with Szymanski, whom he described as a top-notch athletic director who understands how college basketball works. “My children have been in school here four years now and I didn’t want them displaced.” “I was hoping to find something that would keep my family here on the Eastern Shore,” Sachs said. Part of the reason why Sachs left a terrific situation at Bethany College to accept the Salisbury job was because his wife grew up on the Eastern Shore and still has family in the region. “We want to get things turned around and were very fortunate that Coach Sachs was available and interested,” Szymanski said. The Skipjacks are coming off a dismal 8-16 campaign. Chesapeake competed successfully at that level for many years before men’s basketball fell on hard times and dropped to Division II as a result.įormer head coach John Mappas led Chesapeake College to the Division I Region XX championship in 2008, but the program’s last winning record came during the 2012-2013 season when it finished 17-12. Szymasnski, in his 20 th year as athletic director and baseball coach at Chesapeake, believes Sachs can get Chesapeake back to Division I of the National Junior College Athletic Association. Sachs was not pleased with the entire turn of events at Salisbury and released his own account of what led to his departure, admitting to “small errors and mistakes” while noting there was not a single NCAA violation under his watch. Earlier this month, athletic director Gerry DiBartolo announced the hiring of Maurice Williams as head coach. Sachs was initially placed on administrative leave and eventually accepted a buyout offer then resigned after it became clear he would not be retained.Īssistant Brian McDermott served as interim coach and used the players Sachs had recruited to lead Salisbury back to the NCAA Tournament. The Sea Gulls had seven players named to the Capital Athletic Conference All-Academic team during that season.įor reasons still not fully known, the Salisbury athletic administration ousted Sachs prior to this past season. Andy rejects this worldview and it’s easy to see why.Equally as important, Salisbury men’s basketball players performed well in the classroom, compiling a 3.2 grade point average as an entire team during the 2017-2018 campaign – highest in program history. She could never have obtained her position without making such choices. Miranda also emphasizes that difficult choices, such as hurting someone close to you, are part of climbing the ladder in the media/fashion world. This observation is, of course, true and it’s the final straw for Andy, who then quits being Miranda’s assistant in dramatic fashion, by tossing her work phone into a Parisian fountain. Miranda tells Andy that they have a lot in common, specifically that they are both willing to betray someone they care about in order to advance their own career. The most insight the audience gets about Miranda Priestly is at the end of the film, when her assistant Andy is about to quit. So gird your loins, toss on a pair of Jimmy Choos, and let’s analyze each potential evildoer in this deceptively complex film and make a case for why, in the offices of the fictional Runway magazine, evil abounds. But there are plenty of other characters who are prime candidates for one of hell’s many circles. They are both delightful and hilarious and shall not be demeaned. One thing is clear: the villain is most definitely not Emily Charlton ( Emily Blunt), nor is it Nigel Kipling ( Stanley Tucci). Is the villain actually the protagonist, who judges everyone around her, then suddenly adopts their lifestyle and beliefs before ultimately deciding she is, in fact, too good for all of them? Is the devil really the protagonist's boyfriend, who belittles her job and inexplicably sulks when his girlfriend can’t celebrate his birthday on a busy work night? Is the villain the male higher-up at Miranda Priestley’s magazine who forces her to become sociopathic in order to maintain her status as the woman in charge? Or is the central thesis of the film correct and is Priestly just an amoral bully? Fans of The Devil Wears Prada often find that the film’s true villain changes depending on the specific fan’s age, occupation, and life experiences.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |